VibeDex

Flux Schnell vs Dev vs 1.1 Pro vs 2 Pro vs 2 Max: Which Flux Model?

By VibeDex ResearchOriginally published: February 7, 2026Updated: 6 April 2026

TL;DR

FLUX.2 Pro ($0.035)[1] is the best value in the Flux family — scoring 4.53, just 0.016 behind FLUX.2 Max ($0.070)[8] at half the price. The biggest quality jump is from Flux Dev to FLUX.2 Pro (+0.35). Flux Schnell ($0.001)[4] works for prototyping but falls short on complex scenes.

Recommended Benchmarks

The Flux Price-Quality Ladder

FLUX.2 Max tops the family at 4.55, but FLUX.2 Pro reaches 99.6% of that quality at half the price ($0.035 vs $0.070). The 5 Flux models from Black Forest Labs span a 70x price range — here's where each tier makes sense and where you're paying for diminishing returns.

#ModelAvg ScoreCost/ImageTier
1FLUX.2 Max4.54$0.070Premium
2FLUX.2 Pro4.53$0.035Standard
3FLUX 1.1 Pro4.31$0.040Standard
4Flux Dev4.17$0.003Budget
5Flux Schnell3.99$0.001Budget

Average weighted score across 198-200 prompts per model.

Best value: FLUX.2 Pro — 99.6% of Max quality at 50% of the cost.

Best budget: Flux Dev — 92% of FLUX.2 Pro quality at $0.003/image.

Quality by Dimension

Visual fidelity improves steadily across the range. The biggest per-dimension leap is subject integrity from Flux Schnell (3.33) to Flux Dev (3.95) — a +0.62 jump. Instruction adherence also sees a notable improvement from FLUX 1.1 Pro (3.95) to FLUX.2 Pro (4.23), making 2 Pro significantly better at following complex prompts.

ModelVisual FidelityPhysicsSubject IntegrityInstruction Adh.
Flux Schnell4.393.713.333.41
Flux Dev4.654.143.953.85
FLUX 1.1 Pro4.764.254.203.95
FLUX.2 Pro4.834.274.334.23
FLUX.2 Max4.904.344.424.33

Visual Comparisons

Side-by-side outputs on prompts with the largest quality spread across the Flux family. These examples are drawn from our 200+ prompt benchmark suite.

Portrait with symmetrical detail

prompt-0027

“Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression”

Flux Schnell - Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression

Flux Schnell

2.51

Flux Dev - Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression

Flux Dev

3.15

FLUX 1.1 Pro - Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression

FLUX 1.1 Pro

3.87

FLUX.2 Pro - Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression

FLUX.2 Pro

5.00

FLUX.2 Max - Portrait showing both ears of person facing camera directly, symmetrical face, neutral expression

FLUX.2 Max

5.00

Concept art with multiple views

prompt-0119

“Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views”

Flux Schnell - Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views

Flux Schnell

3.06

Flux Dev - Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views

Flux Dev

3.95

FLUX 1.1 Pro - Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views

FLUX 1.1 Pro

2.67

FLUX.2 Pro - Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views

FLUX.2 Pro

4.11

FLUX.2 Max - Concept art turnaround sheet of a post-apocalyptic wanderer showing front, side, and three-quarter views

FLUX.2 Max

4.70

Detailed battle scene

prompt-0084

“Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a...”

Flux Schnell - Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a longsword in a high guard transitioning to an overhead strike, weight committed to the front foot with rear leg pushing off, the defending knight raising a kite shield at a forty-five degree angle to deflect while simultaneously drawing back a mace for a counter-strike, both figures showing anatomically correct joint articulation through gaps in plate armor, spectators visible on wooden stands in the background, overcast sky with diffused lighting, painterly rendering with visible brushwork in the style of Craig Mullins

Flux Schnell

3.13

Flux Dev - Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a longsword in a high guard transitioning to an overhead strike, weight committed to the front foot with rear leg pushing off, the defending knight raising a kite shield at a forty-five degree angle to deflect while simultaneously drawing back a mace for a counter-strike, both figures showing anatomically correct joint articulation through gaps in plate armor, spectators visible on wooden stands in the background, overcast sky with diffused lighting, painterly rendering with visible brushwork in the style of Craig Mullins

Flux Dev

2.93

FLUX 1.1 Pro - Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a longsword in a high guard transitioning to an overhead strike, weight committed to the front foot with rear leg pushing off, the defending knight raising a kite shield at a forty-five degree angle to deflect while simultaneously drawing back a mace for a counter-strike, both figures showing anatomically correct joint articulation through gaps in plate armor, spectators visible on wooden stands in the background, overcast sky with diffused lighting, painterly rendering with visible brushwork in the style of Craig Mullins

FLUX 1.1 Pro

3.60

FLUX.2 Pro - Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a longsword in a high guard transitioning to an overhead strike, weight committed to the front foot with rear leg pushing off, the defending knight raising a kite shield at a forty-five degree angle to deflect while simultaneously drawing back a mace for a counter-strike, both figures showing anatomically correct joint articulation through gaps in plate armor, spectators visible on wooden stands in the background, overcast sky with diffused lighting, painterly rendering with visible brushwork in the style of Craig Mullins

FLUX.2 Pro

4.85

FLUX.2 Max - Concept art battle scene of two armored knights locked in combat on a muddy medieval tournament field, the attacking knight lunging forward with a longsword in a high guard transitioning to an overhead strike, weight committed to the front foot with rear leg pushing off, the defending knight raising a kite shield at a forty-five degree angle to deflect while simultaneously drawing back a mace for a counter-strike, both figures showing anatomically correct joint articulation through gaps in plate armor, spectators visible on wooden stands in the background, overcast sky with diffused lighting, painterly rendering with visible brushwork in the style of Craig Mullins

FLUX.2 Max

4.45

The Sweet Spot: FLUX.2 Pro

FLUX.2 Pro delivers 99.6% of FLUX.2 Max's quality at half the price. And it's actually cheaper than FLUX 1.1 Pro ($0.035 vs $0.040) while scoring higher across every dimension. Unless you need the absolute maximum visual fidelity (4.90 vs 4.83), FLUX.2 Pro is the clear choice for production workloads.

When to Use Each Model

Flux Schnell — $0.001

Strengths

  • +Cheapest option at $0.001/image
  • +Good for simple scenes and quick prototyping
  • +Decent visual fidelity (4.39) for the price

Limitations

  • −Lowest scores on subject integrity (3.33)
  • −Struggles with complex anatomy and detailed objects
  • −Weakest instruction adherence in the family (3.41)

Flux Dev — $0.003

Strengths

  • +Huge quality jump over Schnell for just +$0.002
  • +Strong visual fidelity (4.65) at budget pricing
  • +Good for non-commercial and prototyping work

Limitations

  • −Still below 4.0 on instruction adherence (3.85)
  • −Non-commercial license restrictions
  • −Gaps on complex multi-subject scenes

FLUX.2 Pro — $0.035 (Best Value)

Strengths

  • +Best price-to-quality ratio in the family
  • +Cheaper than FLUX 1.1 Pro with higher scores everywhere
  • +Strong across all 4 dimensions (4.23+ on each)

Limitations

  • −Slightly lower visual fidelity than Max (4.83 vs 4.90)
  • −~12x the cost of Dev for a 0.35 quality increase

FLUX.2 Max — $0.070

Strengths

  • +Highest quality in the Flux family (4.55)
  • +Best visual fidelity (4.90) and instruction adherence (4.33)
  • +Top choice when maximum quality is required

Limitations

  • −Only 0.016 better than Pro at double the price
  • −Diminishing returns for most use cases

A Note on FLUX 1.1 Pro

FLUX 1.1 Pro (4.31) sits between Flux Dev and FLUX.2 Pro in quality but costs $0.040 — more than FLUX.2 Pro ($0.035) despite scoring lower. Unless you have a specific compatibility requirement, FLUX.2 Pro is strictly better: higher quality at lower cost.

Find the Right Flux Model for Your Use Case

The best Flux tier depends on what you're generating. Enter your prompt and we'll recommend the optimal model — including non-Flux alternatives that might score higher.

Try the recommendation engine

Related Benchmarks

How does the Flux family compare to the top overall models? See our GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana Pro benchmark — the two highest-rated models in the full leaderboard.

FLUX.2 Pro also ranks #3 for text rendering — see our text rendering benchmark for the full 18-model ranking.

View the full 18-model leaderboard for overall scores across all quality dimensions.

Sources & References

All external sources were verified as of April 2026. Ratings and metrics reflect the most recent data available at time of review.

  1. Black Forest Labs - FLUX.2 Model Family(bfl.ai)
  2. Black Forest Labs - FLUX.2 Launch Blog(bfl.ai)
  3. TechCrunch - BFL Raises $300M(techcrunch.com)
  4. HuggingFace - FLUX.1 Schnell Weights(huggingface.co)
  5. HuggingFace - FLUX.1 Dev Weights(huggingface.co)
  6. HuggingFace - FLUX.2 Dev Weights(huggingface.co)
  7. Replicate - FLUX.2 Pro API(replicate.com)
  8. Black Forest Labs - FLUX.2 Max(bfl.ai)
  9. Artificial Analysis - FLUX.1 Dev Benchmark(artificialanalysis.ai)
  10. PetaPixel - FLUX.1 On Par with Midjourney(petapixel.com)
  11. GitHub - Black Forest Labs FLUX(github.com)

Recommended Benchmarks

Related Vibedex Benchmarks

Deep Dive

Zapier vs n8n 2026: Breadth vs Self-Host Freedom

Zapier: 8,000+ integrations, Copilot for SMB ops. n8n: free self-host, Code node, dev-native escape hatches — and 4 critical 2026 CVEs. Which one breaks your ops first?

Head-to-Head

Veo-3.1 vs Seedance-1.5: Is $2.68 Worth it?

Is 0.3 points of quality worth paying 6x more? We break down the motion, audio, and consistency differences.

Analysis

AI Video Generator Cost vs Quality (2026)

Seedance 2.0 ($0.70) tops quality at 78% less than Veo 3.1 ($3.20). Full cost-quality analysis of 10 AI video models.

Methodology: Rankings and scores in this article are based on VibeDex's independent benchmarks. Models are evaluated by AI-powered judges across multiple quality dimensions with scores weighted by prompt intent. See our full methodology

FAQ

Which Flux model is the best value?

FLUX.2 Pro at $0.035/image is the sweet spot. It scores 4.53 — only 0.016 behind FLUX.2 Max ($0.070) — making it half the price for nearly identical quality. The Dev-to-2 Pro jump (+0.35 quality) is the largest improvement in the family.

Is Flux Schnell good enough for production?

Flux Schnell (3.99) works well for simple scenes, landscapes, and quick prototyping at $0.001/image. It struggles with complex subjects like detailed anatomy, multi-element scenes, and text rendering. For production work, Flux Dev ($0.003) offers a notable quality jump at 3x the cost — still under a penny.

What is the difference between FLUX 1.1 Pro and FLUX.2 Pro?

FLUX.2 Pro (4.53) scores higher than FLUX 1.1 Pro (4.31) across all four quality dimensions, and is actually cheaper ($0.035 vs $0.040). FLUX.2 Pro is the better choice in every scenario — higher quality at lower cost.

Find the best model for your prompt

VibeDex analyzes your prompt and recommends the best AI image model based on what your specific image demands.

Try VibeDex →