Skip to main content

Seedream 4.5 vs FLUX.2 Pro (2026): Which to Use

By Johnathan Kwok · VibeDex Research

TL;DR

Seedream 4.5 now beats FLUX.2 Pro in the current public Sonnet leaderboard. Seedream scores 4.045 at $0.040/image, while FLUX.2 Pro scores 3.900 at $0.035/image. The old FLUX-wins framing no longer matches the public data.

Current Sonnet Comparison

This page replaces the retired head-to-head framing with the current public Sonnet 4.6 leaderboard scores.

#ModelSonnet ScoreCost/ImageTier
3Seedream 4.54.04$0.040Standard
11FLUX.2 Pro3.90$0.035Standard

Which Should You Use?

Seedream 4.5

Strengths

  • +Much higher current Sonnet score
  • +Third overall in the public image leaderboard
  • +Strong standard-price pick near the top

Limitations

  • Costs slightly more than FLUX.2 Pro

FLUX.2 Pro

Strengths

  • +Slightly cheaper at $0.035/image
  • +Useful if the workflow requires Flux-family output

Limitations

  • Trails Seedream 4.5 by 0.145 points
  • No longer the stronger current public pick

Related Vibedex Benchmarks

Methodology: Rankings and scores in this article align to VibeDex's current Sonnet 4.6 blind benchmark: 50 prompts, 3 passes, and 150 judgments per model across visual fidelity, physics, subject integrity, and instruction adherence. See our full methodology

FAQ

Is Seedream 4.5 better than FLUX.2 Pro now?

Yes. In the current Sonnet leaderboard, Seedream 4.5 scores 4.045 versus 3.900 for FLUX.2 Pro.

Which is cheaper?

FLUX.2 Pro is slightly cheaper at $0.035/image versus $0.040/image for Seedream 4.5.

Does this article use retired head-to-head win counts?

No. This rewrite uses current Sonnet leaderboard scores only.

See how every model stacks up

The Vibedex leaderboard ranks 18 image models on a 50-prompt blind benchmark, judged by Claude Sonnet 4.6 across visual fidelity, physics, subject integrity, and instruction adherence.

See the leaderboard