Skip to main content

Qwen Image 2512 vs Flux Dev: Current Budget Comparison

By Johnathan Kwok · VibeDex Research

TL;DR

Qwen Image 2512 is the stronger current budget pick over Flux Dev. Both are listed at $0.003/image, but Qwen scores 3.872 in the public Sonnet leaderboard versus 3.504 for Flux Dev.

Current Sonnet Comparison

This page replaces the old win-count framing with the current public Sonnet 4.6 scores. Because both models have the same listed price, the decision is straightforward: Qwen has the stronger current benchmark result.

#ModelSonnet ScoreCost/ImageTier
12Qwen Image 25123.87$0.003Budget
17Flux Dev3.50$0.003Budget

When to Use Each

Qwen Image 2512

Strengths

  • +Higher current Sonnet score at the same listed price
  • +Best true-budget pick in the current public table

Limitations

  • Still below the strongest standard and premium models

Flux Dev

Strengths

  • +Same listed price as Qwen
  • +Useful if your workflow already depends on the Flux ecosystem

Limitations

  • Lower current Sonnet score than Qwen
  • Below the top budget and standard picks

Related Vibedex Benchmarks

Methodology: Rankings and scores in this article align to VibeDex's current Sonnet 4.6 blind benchmark: 50 prompts, 3 passes, and 150 judgments per model across visual fidelity, physics, subject integrity, and instruction adherence. See our full methodology

FAQ

Is Qwen Image 2512 better than Flux Dev?

Yes. In the current Sonnet benchmark, Qwen Image 2512 scores 3.872 versus 3.504 for Flux Dev.

Which one is cheaper?

Both are listed at $0.003/image in the current VibeDex cost table.

Does this article use retired win-count claims?

No. This rewrite uses current Sonnet leaderboard scores only.

See how every model stacks up

The Vibedex leaderboard ranks 18 image models on a 50-prompt blind benchmark, judged by Claude Sonnet 4.6 across visual fidelity, physics, subject integrity, and instruction adherence.

See the leaderboard